Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
REPOWER
Forum Login
Login Name: Create a new account
Password:     Forgot password

BAC Forum    General Boards    Technical Support  ›  REPOWER Moderators: Gerald Farris

REPOWER  This thread currently has 1,093 views. Print
2 Pages 1 2 All Recommend Thread
dhburris
August 7, 2011, 2:11pm Report to Moderator

2008 Contessa 42
BAC Member
Posts Per Day: 0.01
Time Online: 44 days 10 hours 50 minutes
Has anyone re-powered their Coach?  Considering, if possible, going from a 400 Cat to a 500 Cummins, in a 2008 Contessa.  Can this be done, and if so, what would be the approximate cost?



David & Jane
Franklinton, LA
2008 Contessa 42
Logged Offline
Private Message
Tom and Pam Brown
August 7, 2011, 3:22pm Report to Moderator
1999 Beaver Marquis Tourmaline
BAC Member
Posts Per Day: 0.03
Time Online: 13 days 4 hours 19 minutes
Location: Hampton, Georgia
I think the cost would be outragous.

New bell housing so the transmission would mount to the new engine.

New motor mounts to the engine.

New or changed plumbing for the fuel, water and air system.  Will the enginge fit into the old space without modification?

Also, the electronics would have to be at the very least modified to recognize the new power plant.

If you need or want more power then consider upgrading the Cat it will be less expensive with the fewest unknowns.

Have fun with your quest!
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 26
Larry Fisk
August 7, 2011, 4:03pm Report to Moderator

BAC Member
Posts Per Day: 0.04
Time Online: 5 days 12 hours 53 minutes
Location: Sterling, Alaska
I have the C-13 525 hp Cat and am very pleased with its performance. Maybe that would be a possibility.


Larry Fisk
2005 Patriot Thunder 40 ft.
525 (C-13) CAT Engine
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 26
Gerald Farris
August 7, 2011, 4:46pm Report to Moderator

Board Moderator
Posts Per Day: 0.06
Time Online: 75 days 18 hours 49 minutes
Location: FULLTIMER
An engine exchange from a C9 Cat to a M11 Cummins would be a lot more money that it is worth. There are several modifications that can be done to your current engine to get more horsepower if you really do need more power.

The C9 marine engine will produce 567 BHP, so there is a potential for more HP in the C9 than the 400 that you are now rated at. There are several companies that modify diesel engines in trucks to increase performance if you are not worried about emissions.

The downside to any modification is that you will probably be kissing your Cat engine warranty goodbye. So stop and think, how many times do you really need more power and what would be the benefits of more power. You will get to the top of the hill a couple of minutes faster and you will get some bragging rights. The few minutes that you save in climbing the hill will be of questionable value since we drive these coaches because of the relaxed life style and not to race. The question on the bragging rights, you will have to place a value on that.

The bottom line is that if you want a lot more power, it would be a lot more cost effective to trade your Contessa for a 2007 to 2009 Marquis with a 600HP C15. That will give you the luxury, performance, and resale ability that an engine swap in your coach alone will not and at a reasonably compatible cost.

Gerald          


2000 Marquis, C12
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 3 - 26
dhburris
August 7, 2011, 8:08pm Report to Moderator

2008 Contessa 42
BAC Member
Posts Per Day: 0.01
Time Online: 44 days 10 hours 50 minutes
Thanks,
I may have other issues??  It seems when I climb step grades, CO &  NC,  the engine will run hot, unless I gear down and get the RPM's in the 2000 range.  Would this be considered normal??

A friend following in the same mountains, with a 500 hp Cummins on a spartan, never gets over 200 degrees.  Of course he pulls the hills without having to manual down shift.  ANY insite on this?


David & Jane
Franklinton, LA
2008 Contessa 42
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 26
Richard And Babs Ames
August 7, 2011, 8:22pm Report to Moderator
Moderator
Posts Per Day: 0.06
Time Online: 33 days 1 hours 32 minutes
The RPM's needs to stay in the 2,000 RPM range for the best cooling and is normal.


1997 Beaver Patriot
3126B  CAT  
South Central FL
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 26
Joel Ashley
August 7, 2011, 10:31pm Report to Moderator

Go OSU Beavers Class of '73. RVing 27 years
BAC Member
Posts Per Day: 0.06
Time Online: 23 days 7 hours 37 minutes
Location: Clackamas, Oregon
I think Gerald hit it on the head.  There are plenty of cheaper ways to get more power, but if you want a bigger engine, you might as well buy one with a coach already around it.  You'll never get your money's worth any other way.  Your 42' coach is a fair amount of load for 400HP;  our 36' 400HP rig, on the other hand, has plenty of power and I'm more than happy with the combination.

-Joel


Joel and Lee Ashley
36 ft 2006 Monterey
C9 400HP Cat
Beaver Believers
Logged Offline
Private Message Skype Reply: 6 - 26
Gerald Farris
August 8, 2011, 3:27am Report to Moderator

Board Moderator
Posts Per Day: 0.06
Time Online: 75 days 18 hours 49 minutes
Location: FULLTIMER
So your complaint is not low power, it is insufficient cooling. Changing the engine out for that reason is a total waste of time and money. If you are sure that your radiator is clean, your best option is to just gear down and keep your RPMs up on the few occasions where it is needed. You can increase the cooling capacity of your coach with modifications if necessary, but if hill climbing is the only time that you notice a problem, the correction is easy and free, gear down.

The cooling system on a coach is sized by the design engineers to meet the perceived heat loads that it will have to deal with. If the cooling system is oversized for the heat load that it that it has to deal with, it will be more expensive as well as less fuel efficient. The radiator cooling fan on a diesel pusher can require as much as 60 HP just to drive the fan, so to much fan can be a problem. To much radiator can be a negative in the size needed for installation as well as overcooling the engine so that it can not run continually with the thermostat open to allow maximum coolant flow and even cooling throughout the engine.

The bottom line is, be certain that your radiator is clean, and if that does not sufficiently solve your problem, and you are opposed to gearing down, have a radiator company design a larger and more efficient radiator that can be mounted in your coach. Such a radiator will probably cost in the $3,000 to $5,000 range.

Gerald    


2000 Marquis, C12
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 7 - 26
Edward Buker
August 8, 2011, 6:15am Report to Moderator

BAC Member
Posts Per Day: 0.06
Time Online: 22 days 5 hours 33 minutes
The wisdom to replace the coach rather than try and modify it by repowering is right on. If you find you cannot tolerate your coaches performance then a trade would be the much better answer.

Our last coach was an 89 Contessa had a Cat 3208 and a 4 speed Allison. For 10 years of ownership, on major climbs, we would run for miles at 2800RPM in second gear at 35 miles an hour. At that speed the engine temperatures would rise to 200F. That speed and temperature was normal for that coach. Your 400hp Cat C7 certainly does a better job than that.

So the question is are you expecting too much or are you being short changed....That is hard to know. What is the normal climbing and cooling ability for a 400hp C9 in your Contessa? If possible running a test under the same conditions with another Contessa with the same drivetrain would give you the answer. You would need to find a volunteer to run that test....

The alternative to that would be to have a major Cat service center for trucks run a dyno test to be sure that you are getting the 400HP output that you should be getting and that the cooling fan RPM is normal under those conditions. If that is as it should be, the radiator is clean as Gerald states, and the radiator perimeter is isolated (mine uses a rubber material) so that hot exhausted air cannot be pulled around and enter the front side of the radiator. Also the fan shroud is as it should be, then you have the knowledge that your systems are working as designed. From there it is a matter of gaining some speed before a climb and optimizing your gear selection to keep the RPMs where you want them. I would think coming out of economy mode before a climb would also be a help here.

I would just want to be sure that you are getting the performance that you paid for and that you are operating the coach in a manner that optimizes its performance before looking at taking some drastic measures. Hope this helps.

Later Ed


Ed Buker
Lillian AL
2002 Beaver Marquis
Cat C12
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 8 - 26
Bill Sprague
August 8, 2011, 3:11pm Report to Moderator
BAC Member
Posts Per Day: 0.03
Time Online: 17 days 8 hours 19 minutes
Location: Milton, WA
Nobody mentioned the possibility of a faulty thermostat.  

Nor has anybody suggested a definition of HOT.  My Cummins runs at about 180 on the Aladdin.  Once, on a very long hill and very hot day, it crept up to around 200.  Alarmed, I got the book out and I think I remember the limit is about 220.  I had a long ways to go!  

Another possibility, maybe even a probability, is that the gauge is faulty.  My Aladdin readout is about 20 degrees cooler than the dash dial.  If you are defining HOT based on a dash dial readout, your engine may actually be running where it is supposed to.


Bill Sprague
2004 Monterey
ISC 350 Cummins
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 9 - 26
Gerald Farris
August 8, 2011, 3:39pm Report to Moderator

Board Moderator
Posts Per Day: 0.06
Time Online: 75 days 18 hours 49 minutes
Location: FULLTIMER
Bill,
There is almost no chance that a faulty thermostat can cause the conditions that the coach owner explained.

Gerald


2000 Marquis, C12
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 10 - 26
LEAH DRAPER
August 8, 2011, 3:52pm Report to Moderator
BAC Member
Posts Per Day: 0.02
Time Online: 6 days 11 hours 10 minutes
Location: Corrales, NM
If Cat raised the HP from 400 to 425 on later models (or some) of the C9 Cat as well as the torque, why can't this also be done for those who have the C9 with only 400 HP??


2008 Contessa (425 hp Cat) 38'
PT Cruiser/SMI braking
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 11 - 26
Robert Mathis
August 8, 2011, 3:59pm Report to Moderator
BAC Member
Posts Per Day: 0.01
Time Online: 103 days 12 hours 56 minutes
Location: st. Augustine, Fl
Another big problem with adding more horsepower is that the more power you make, the more heat you generate. It is actually pretty easy to increase the horsepower of a modern electronically controlled diesel engine. A computer chip or "flash" can add as much as 100 horsepower. A larger exhaust, or bigger turbo can do wonders, but then you will need to increase the cooling system's capacity to match. A second problem with doing this is that under heavy loads, your exhaust gas temps will rise to the point where you can actually melt the turbo vanes. When I have "tricked up" my diesels in my trucks, I have always added a pyrometer to the exhuast system just before the turbo to monitor the EGT's. You would be amazed to see how fast and far they can climb. I would get a coach with a bigger engine already in place. Everything is designed around that engine and it's cooling needs.


2007 Contessa
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 12 - 26
Gerald Farris
August 8, 2011, 6:08pm Report to Moderator

Board Moderator
Posts Per Day: 0.06
Time Online: 75 days 18 hours 49 minutes
Location: FULLTIMER
Leah,
There is one concern in having the coach ECM (engine control module) reprogrammed or "flashed" to a higher horsepower rating that has not been mentioned. That is the cost of having the Cat dealer perform the reprogram.

Most Cat dealers will charge you one hour labor for the reprogram.
That is a reasonable and fair charge, but then you have to pay Caterpillar for the proprietary software that was downloaded into your ECM as well as the increase in warranty charges to cover you engine under warranty at the higher ratings if it is still under warranty as virtually all of the C9 engines are. I would expect the cost to be between $700 and $1,000 for something that you will rarely notice, if ever.

Gerald


2000 Marquis, C12
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 13 - 26
Bill Sprague
August 9, 2011, 4:45am Report to Moderator
BAC Member
Posts Per Day: 0.03
Time Online: 17 days 8 hours 19 minutes
Location: Milton, WA
Quoted from Gerald Farris
Bill,
There is almost no chance that a faulty thermostat can cause the conditions that the coach owner explained.

Gerald


Gerald,

That's good to know, but why is it not likely to stick?  Doesn't it open and close to allow more or less coolant to flow to keep a stable operating temperature?  Do they fail to full open?

Thanks.

Bill



Bill Sprague
2004 Monterey
ISC 350 Cummins
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 14 - 26
LEAH DRAPER
August 9, 2011, 2:44pm Report to Moderator
BAC Member
Posts Per Day: 0.02
Time Online: 6 days 11 hours 10 minutes
Location: Corrales, NM
GERALD
Thank you for the reply to my question.  You alway sare so good about explaining things, especially to me.  
Something that logically seemed so simple to me, certainly has a lot of ramifications.  WOW!
Again thanks for your insight and expertise.
Leah


2008 Contessa (425 hp Cat) 38'
PT Cruiser/SMI braking
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 15 - 26
Gerald Farris
August 9, 2011, 3:01pm Report to Moderator

Board Moderator
Posts Per Day: 0.06
Time Online: 75 days 18 hours 49 minutes
Location: FULLTIMER
Bill,
Yes the engine thermostat does open and close to maintain the engine temperature, and yes a thermostat failure on a fairly new Cat engine is rare, but it does happen. However, the reason that I said that there was almost no chance that a defective thermostat was causing the overheat problem in this case, is because of the conditions under which it happened.

The coach overheats only on a grade if the coach is not downshifted to bring up the RPMs, and the condition can be duplicated under the same conditions, but the coach does not overheat at any other times.  If a thermostat was sticking, it would not only stick under a very specific set of conditions, and stick every time that those conditions exist. The thermostat is a heat regulated mechanical valve that has no way of detecting whether you are climbing a hill or not.

Gerald    


2000 Marquis, C12
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 16 - 26
Dick Simonis
August 9, 2011, 3:58pm Report to Moderator
BAC Member
Posts Per Day: 0.09
Time Online: 5 days 16 hours 29 minutes
Location: Green Valley, AZ
While I can't speak to the Cat thermostat specifiacally, I have never seen one "stick" closed.  They are typically designed to fail open which would cause the engine to run cool.


Dick and Pat

Green Valley, AZ

2000 Beaver Patriot Thunder
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 17 - 26
Bill Sprague
August 9, 2011, 6:44pm Report to Moderator
BAC Member
Posts Per Day: 0.03
Time Online: 17 days 8 hours 19 minutes
Location: Milton, WA
Quoted from Gerald Farris
...... If a thermostat was sticking, it would not only stick under a very specific set of conditions and stick every time that those conditions exist. The thermostat is a heat regulated mechanical valve that has no way of detecting whether you are climbing a hill or not.  

Thank you for taking the time to answer, Gerald.  I learned something that may be useful someday.

Bill



Bill Sprague
2004 Monterey
ISC 350 Cummins
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 18 - 26
Bill Sprague
August 9, 2011, 6:46pm Report to Moderator
BAC Member
Posts Per Day: 0.03
Time Online: 17 days 8 hours 19 minutes
Location: Milton, WA
Quoted from Dick Simonis
While I can't speak to the Cat thermostat specifiacally, I have never seen one "stick" closed.  They are typically designed to fail open which would cause the engine to run cool.

Thanks!  I didn't know that either.  It does make sense they should work that way.



Bill Sprague
2004 Monterey
ISC 350 Cummins
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 19 - 26
Gil_Johnson
August 9, 2011, 10:21pm Report to Moderator

BAC Member
Posts Per Day: 0.05
Time Online: 5 days 4 hours 8 minutes
I thought all '08 Contessa's were 425HP Cats.  I can think of other reasons to abandoned the Cat engine and have considered all options.  A re-power is simply not cost effective.  I looked at trading the coach but the cost was also too much, especially given I would be move down in quality and size.

My '08 Contessa has been on CAT's chassis dyno and the power was very close to that advertised, but there was some reduction on turbo boost, due to the charge air cooler being at the edge of Cat's acceptable parameters.  My coach routinely runs between 190 degrees and 206 degrees.  A range that's within Cat's specifications.

The marine engines are a whole different animal, so don't think you can get anywhere near their horsepower ratings.  Marine engines run much cooler at a constant 185-190 degrees due to sea water heat exchangers.  Also marine engines don't have the strict EPA requirements, so you won't find exhaust regeneration systems on a boat.

Gil
'08 Contessa Westport 42



Gil
2008 Contessa Westport 42
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 20 - 26
LEAH DRAPER
August 9, 2011, 10:48pm Report to Moderator
BAC Member
Posts Per Day: 0.02
Time Online: 6 days 11 hours 10 minutes
Location: Corrales, NM
Gil

"I thought all '08 Contessa's were 425HP Cats."

Not necessarily.....I ve seen a lot of '08 Contessa's with 400hp.  I wouldn't buy one until they had 425 hp.


2008 Contessa (425 hp Cat) 38'
PT Cruiser/SMI braking
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 21 - 26
Dick Simonis
August 10, 2011, 1:36am Report to Moderator
BAC Member
Posts Per Day: 0.09
Time Online: 5 days 16 hours 29 minutes
Location: Green Valley, AZ
Curious, what is the torque of the newer 400 - 425 CATs as oppose to the older C12 425?


Dick and Pat

Green Valley, AZ

2000 Beaver Patriot Thunder
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 22 - 26
Gerald Farris
August 10, 2011, 2:34am Report to Moderator

Board Moderator
Posts Per Day: 0.06
Time Online: 75 days 18 hours 49 minutes
Location: FULLTIMER
Dick,
The 425 HP C-9 can be rated at either 1250 or 1350 lb-ft of torque. I am not sure which version Monaco used, or if they may have used both versions.  The 400HP C-9 is rated at 1250 lb-ft of torque. The 425 HP C-12 can be rated at either 1450 or 1550 lb-ft of torque, and SMC did install both versions in Beaver coaches.

Gerald


2000 Marquis, C12
Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 23 - 26
Dick Simonis
August 10, 2011, 5:02am Report to Moderator
BAC Member
Posts Per Day: 0.09
Time Online: 5 days 16 hours 29 minutes
Location: Green Valley, AZ
Fascinating.  CAT seems to have the HP and torque ratings really dialed in, and I'm sure there is a great reason for having so many variations in the same engine.  I suspect that later model years are affected by emission controls, that were added as time passed.

Reckon I will be content with our C12 at 425/1550.  At first I thought ours might be underpowered, as the chap next door was mentioning that his Prevost was running 500 hp and 1900 torque, so I kind of figured that was normal for a DP.


Dick and Pat

Green Valley, AZ

2000 Beaver Patriot Thunder
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 24 - 26
Robert Mathis
August 10, 2011, 12:47pm Report to Moderator
BAC Member
Posts Per Day: 0.01
Time Online: 103 days 12 hours 56 minutes
Location: st. Augustine, Fl
Back to the thermostat issue,  I've seen lots of thermostats that fail to open "stick closed" but have never seen one that will open properly, then close while the engine is still above opening temperature.  I guess this ages me, but I have often placed a suspect thermostat in a pan of cold water, with a meat or candy thermometer in place, turned on the heat and watched for it to open while watching the  thermometer. That was the way we tested them.  BTW, on my marine diesels, we notice the temperature climb as we approach full throttle. Even with a properly functioning salt water to fresh heat exchanger, the top end of the horsepower range will produce enough heat to almost overcome the system. I have found that even one barnacle in the raw water intake would cause and overheat condition. Much like a dirty radiator.


2007 Contessa
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 25 - 26
dhburris
August 13, 2011, 9:18pm Report to Moderator

2008 Contessa 42
BAC Member
Posts Per Day: 0.01
Time Online: 44 days 10 hours 50 minutes
Thanks ALL,

Hot is 220-225

The Aladin and engine led say the same temp.

Is there anyone that has the C9 400 in a 42 to that can confirm this is happening to them also?

Thanks David


David & Jane
Franklinton, LA
2008 Contessa 42
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 26 - 26
2 Pages 1 2 All Recommend Thread
Print

BAC Forum    General Boards    Technical Support  ›  REPOWER

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread